Editorial standard

How FULFILL evaluates products

We separate vendor documentation, independent evidence and our own testing. A missing test is recorded as missing; it is not filled with an estimate.

01
15%

Merchant identity and legitimacy

Legal identity, operating footprint, programme provenance and contact route.

02
20%

Product value and evidence

Current documentation, supported claims and controlled testing where feasible.

03
15%

Terms and customer treatment

Price, recurrence, cancellation, refund, delivery and support clarity.

04
10%

Reputation pattern

Current multi-source evidence, with review-manipulation awareness.

05
10%

Audience and intent fit

A defined user problem and a credible reason for this product to be considered.

06
10%

Economics

Commission, attribution, payout timing, holds, reversals and net contribution.

07
15%

Compliance and claim risk

Disclosure, sector rules, traffic restrictions and prohibited claims.

08
5%

Resilience

Merchant, network, channel and geography concentration.

80-100

Eligible for controlled approval

All hard gates must still pass. A score never overrides prohibited-category or safety blocks.

60-79

Manual review

No automatic promotion. Additional evidence and operator approval are required.

Below 60

Blocked

The offer is not promoted. The reason and evidence date are retained for audit.

Ranking policy

FULFILL does not publish a numeric ranking until the compared products have a defined test protocol, comparable evidence, dated results and an explanation of weighting. Sponsored placement and affiliate economics cannot secretly change editorial order.

Methodology version 0.1 · Last reviewed 22 July 2026. Material changes will be recorded on the corrections page.